[Study of practices: What do general practitioners first propose when faced with asymptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease?] / Enquête de pratiques : que proposent en premier les médecins généralistes devant une artériopathie asymptomatique des membres inférieurs ?

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral artery disease of lower limbs (PAD) can be discovered at an asymptomatic stage by the realization of systolic pressure indices. The 2006 recommendations of the French National Authority for Health on AOMI encourage the systematic prescription of antiplatelet agents; the 2012 recommendations on the proper use of antiplatelet agents no longer encourage it in the case of asymptomatic PAD. These two recommendations still coexist. Our objective was to determine the management of an asymptomatic PAD by general practitioners. METHODS: Descriptive and analytical epidemiological study, with analysis of practices, prospectively addressed by postal questionnaire to a randomized sample of 220 GPs practicing in the European Metropolis of Lille between December 15, 2016 and February 15, 2017. The question was: "if an asymptomatic PAD is discovered in a 50-year-old patient who is otherwise in good general condition, what do you generally do?" RESULTS: Our sample was 92 general practitioners (42% participation). Of these, only 6 were practicing HPIs. Before an asymptomatic PAD, management included an opinion from an angiologist (84%) and/or a cardiologist (75%) before the drug was prescribed (antiplatelet agent for 57%, statin for 33% and ACE inhibitor for 14%). CONCLUSION: The extension assessment was carried out in more than 8 out of 10 cases. The use of antiplatelet antiaggregants was significant, which can be explained by the coexistence of divergent recommendations. The rapid clarification of recommendations is essential with the evolution of scientific data.

[Abortion in Hauts-de-France: When to expect the first appointment?] / Interruption volontaire de grossesse dans les Hauts-de-France : quel délai pour un premier rendez-vous ?

BACKGROUND: According to the French National Authority for Health ("Haute Autorité de santé"), the first appointment for an abortion should take place within five days of the request. Whether this deadline is met or not in the Hauts-de-France region is not known. AIM: The aim of this study was to measure the time needed to get a first appointment for an abortion in Hauts-de-France. METHOD: We conducted a telephone survey of health facilities, family planning and registered practitioners practicing abortions in the Hauts-de-France region, to determine the next appointment available for a woman requesting an abortion. The calls took place between April 10 and 14, 2017. The time needed to get a first appointment (means±standard deviations) was calculated for the region, the departments, the districts and the health facilities and practitioners. RESULTS: We contacted 93 health facilities and practitioners and 70 were included in the study. The time needed to get a first appointment for an abortion in Hauts-de-France was measured at 5.25±5.20 days: 6.32±4.72 days for health facilities, 3.84±5.11 days for gynecologists, 5.22±5.88 days for general practitioners and 0.67±0.58 days for private-practice midwives. Fifty-six percent of health facilities and practitioners gave the appointment within five days. Between the districts, the average time varied from 1 to 15.5 days. CONCLUSION: The average time needed to get a first appointment for an abortion in Hauts-de-France was near the 5-day deadline recommended by the French National Authority for Health. The training of private practice midwives and general practitioners may be the first step in shortening it in some districts where access to health care is limited.

[Preferences of general practitioners in metropolitan France with regard to the delegation of medico-administrative tasks to secretaries assisting medico-social workers: Study in conjoint analysis]. / Préférences des médecins généralistes libéraux en France métropolitaine quant à la délégation des tâches médico-administratives aux secrétaires assistant(e)s médico-social(e)s : étude en analyse conjointe.

BACKGROUND: A general practitioner's office is an economic unit where task delegation is an essential component in improving the quality and performance of work. AIM: To classify the preferences of general practitioners regarding the delegation of medical-administrative tasks to assistant medical-social secretaries. METHOD: Conjoint analysis was applied to a random sample of 175 general practitioners working in metropolitan France. Ten scenarios were constructed based on seven attributes: training for medical secretaries, logistical support during the consultation, delegation of management planning, medical records, accounting, maintenance, and taking initiative on the telephone. A factorial design was used to reduce the number of scenarios. Physicians' socio-demographic variables were collected. RESULTS: One hundred and three physicians responded and the analysis included 90 respondents respecting the transitivity of preferences hypothesis. Perceived difficulty was scored 2.8 out of 5. The high rates of respondents (59%; 95% CI [51.7-66.3]) and transitivity (87.5%; 95% CI [81.1-93.9]) showed physicians' interest in this topic. Delegation of tasks concerning management planning (OR=2.91; 95% CI [2.40-13.52]) and medical records (OR=1.88; 95% CI [1.56-2.27]) were the two most important attributes for physicians. The only variable for which the choice of a secretary was not taken into account was logistical support. CONCLUSION: This is a first study examining the choices of general practitioners concerning the delegation of tasks to assistants. These findings are helpful to better understand the determinants of practitioners' choices in delegating certain tasks or not. They reveal doctors' desire to limit their ancillary tasks in order to favor better use of time for "medical" tasks. They also expose interest for training medical secretaries and widening their field of competence, suggesting the emergence of a new professional occupation that could be called "medical assistant".

[Theoretical and practical assessment of Lille general practice and pharmacy students' knowledge about use of inhaler devices for asthma control]. / Évaluation théorique et pratique de la connaissance d'utilisation des dispositifs inhalés dans l'asthme chez les internes en médecine générale et les étudiants en pharmacie de Lille.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is a potentially serious chronic respiratory disease impacting patients quality of life. Satisfactory control requires proper use of inhaled devices. This study assesses general medical residents and pharmacy students knowledge about proper use of inhaled asthma devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated knowledge of 43 general practice students and 43 pharmacy students in Lille for three inhaler devices (metered-dose inhaler, Turbuhaler® and Diskus®) during individual interviews. Students were assessed on 8 proper use criterias for each device. RESULTS: General practice and pharmacy students are unfamiliar with proper use of inhaler devices. However, pharmacy students get better average scores than general practice students for all devices included in this study: 6.3/8 respected criterias against 5/8 for metered-dose inhaler; 5.3/8 against 3.2/8 for Turbuhaler®; and 6/8 against 4.3/8 for Diskus®. Pharmacy students more frequently perform a demonstration of proper use to patients when a device is first prescribed or when a prescription is renewed; general practice students more frequently ask patients themselves to perform a demonstration of proper use. CONCLUSION: Introducing trainings workshops for inhaler devices to pharmacy and general practice students appears appropriate in order to promote therapeutic patient education, to increase asthma control and better patients life quality.